Ryan Contracting Company v. O'Neill & Murphy, LLP
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Judge.
We reverse and remand the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent because appellant raised genuine issues of material fact regarding whether its 2007 lien-foreclosure action would have been successful but-for the negligence of its attorney. In the interests of judicial economy, we affirm the district court’s analysis in its alternative holding, challenged in respondents’ related appeal, that appellant raised genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment regarding whether its 2010 settlement agreement precluded its malpractice suit.
FACTS
In…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Kloster-Madsen, Inc. v. Tafi's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ryan Contracting Company v. O'Neill & Murphy, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016