Legal Opinion

Desruisseau v. Cameron

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 7, 1980No. 1 CA-CIV 4517PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Presiding Judge.

Appellants Roland and Vera Desruisseau (hereafter Desruisseau) appeal from a directed verdict dismissing their complaint as barred by the limitation of action under A.R.S. § 12-543(3).

Appellees George and Grace Cameron (hereafter Cameron) were granted a directed verdict following Desruisseau’s opening statements. Thus, on review we must review the allegations of the complaint as true, granting all reasonable inferences in favor of Desruisseau. Trollope v. Koerner, 106 Ariz. 10, 470 P.2d 91 (1970).

In May of 1971, Cameron sold real property to Desruisseau. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Trollope v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Sato v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. City of Phoenix v. SittenfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Desruisseau v. IsleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arizona Management Corp. v. KallofCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Arizona Department of Water Resources v. Rail N Ranch Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API