Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Hyson, United States of America v. Edward Ennis, A/K/A "Tiger", United States of America v. Richard Gomes
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 23, 1983No. 82-1837, 82-1838 and 82-1911PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*859BOWNES, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by defendants-appellants Richard Gomes, Edward Ennis and Robert Hyson from jury convictions of conspiring with Federick Martineau to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute heroin, marijuana, hashish and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.1 Gomes and Ennis have filed consolidated briefs; Hyson has appealed separately. We reverse the conviction of Gomes and affirm the convictions of Ennis and Hyson.
I. Whether the District Court Properly Denied the Motion of Hyson to Suppress
The pertinent evidence adduced at the motion to suppress is…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- United States v. Ofray-CamposCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. CrestaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Adegboyega AkitoyeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. SpinneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.