Rorick v. Chancey
Supreme Court of Florida
1Dissent
After argument on the rehearing, granted in this case, I am inclined to the view that the position taken by us in our original opinion in this case is erroneous, in that it would result in the establishment of a rule in this State which would penalize a party for applying for the removal of a cause pending in a court of this state to the federal court and would violate the rule of comity between state and federal courts. I still agree with the general statement made by Mr. Justice CHAPMAN in his opinion upon the original hearing, that it is within the power of a state court to determine what…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.