Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rorick v. Chancey

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 26, 1938Published

1Dissent

After argument on the rehearing, granted in this case, I am inclined to the view that the position taken by us in our original opinion in this case is erroneous, in that it would result in the establishment of a rule in this State which would penalize a party for applying for the removal of a cause pending in a court of this state to the federal court and would violate the rule of comity between state and federal courts. I still agree with the general statement made by Mr. Justice CHAPMAN in his opinion upon the original hearing, that it is within the power of a state court to determine what…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API