Legal Opinion

Reinhart v. Oconto County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Oconto County. The case sufficiently appears in the opinion. to the point that the certificates were valid, and therefore the money paid for them could not be recovered back, cited numerous, cases, which are referred to in the opinion. The case having been decided upon this point, others need not be noticed.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Oconto County. The case sufficiently appears in the opinion. to the point that the certificates were valid, and therefore the money paid for them could not be recovered back, cited numerous, cases, which are referred to in the opinion. The case having been decided upon this point, others need not be noticed. Among other things, they contended that the certificates were fatally defective, because they failed to give the name of the city or village where the lots were situate; and extrinsic evidence was not admissible to explain them. Campbell v. Paol&ard, 61…

1Opinion of the CourtObtoN, J.

This was a claim originally presented to the board of supervisors of Oconto county by the plaintiff, under *354gee. 1184, R. S., which reads as follows: “If, after the sale or conveyance of any land sold for the nonpayment of taxes, and within the time hereinafter prescribed, it shall be discovered that the sale, or the certificate issued thereon, was invalid, the county board shall make an order briefly stating the reason therefor, directing that the money paid for such certificate on the sale, and all subsequent charges thereon, and all subsequent taxes paid on the lands described therein, by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mead v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Ganson v. MadiganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Lyman v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. McMillan v. WehleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Beal v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mendota Club v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ritchie v. CatlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API