Legal Opinion
Boykin v. Town of River Junction
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 17, 1936PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The Town of River Junction owns an electric light and power system originally constructed in 1923 by the issuance of general obligation bonds voted by the electors. The existing system yields an annual net revenue the expenditure of which by the municipality for any municipal purpose is authorized by law. It does not own its generating facilities.
The proposition now before the Court is an order denying on appeal from an injunction against the issuance of certain “Electric System Revenue Certificates” described in an ordinance of said Town of River Junction adopted under date of March 16,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- State v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- State v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Wilson v. City of BartowSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- State v. City of ClearwaterSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marvin v. Housing Authority of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Williams v. the Town of DunnellonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- State v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- In Re Thymewood Apartments, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Brooks v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.