Legal Opinion

Edwin Clapp & Son, Inc. v. Knorr

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1920No. 22,476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action brought by Edwin Clapp & Son, a corporation, against W. A. Knorr, to recover an unpaid balance due for goods sold by the plaintiff to the C. E. Reinhart Store, and for other claims for merchandise and labor assigned to plaintiff. Judgment was given in favor of the defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.

It appears that in May, 1911, Knorr owned a stock of shoes in Salem, Ore., and the sale of them was then made to C. E. Reinhart. Some exceptional stipulations were included in the agreement of sale. The purchase price…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clendening v. Red River Valley National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Silver v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Schepflin v. DessarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. In re Henry Ulfelder Clothing Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commodore v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Eads Hide & Wool Company v. L. B. MerrillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  3. Commodore v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API