Legal Opinion
Dorton v. Landmark Dental Care of Tuscaloosa, P.C.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 11, 1991No. 88-1086PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
On application for rehearing, the opinion of this Court dated May 25, 1990, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
The plaintiffs, Marianne Dorton and her husband, Raymond Clyde Dorton, appeal from the denial of a new trial following a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, Landmark Dental Care of Tuscaloosa, P.C. (“Landmark”), and Dr. Harold K. Emmons, in an action alleging negligence and wantoness on the part of the defendants in the dental treatment of Mrs. Dorton.1 The only issue is whether the verdict was against the great weight of the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Jawad v. GranadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- United States v. Charles Robert Talbott, and Clayborn C. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Cloverleaf Plaza, Inc. v. Cooper & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Gavin v. HinrichsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Marks v. Intergraph Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Dolgen Corp. v. HanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997