State v. Rider
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Grant District Court. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Green, C.:
The information in this case charged the defendant with feloniously buying and receiving one mare, of the value of $100, the property of Carl Gall, jr., “then lately before feloniously stolen, taken and carried away,” knowing the same to have been so stolen. The part of § 92 of the crimes act which is applicable to this case is as follows:
“Every person who shall buy or in any way receive any goods, money, i ights in action, personal property, or any valuable security or effects whatsoever, . . . that shall have been stolen from another, knowing the same to have been so…
2Cited by7 opinions
- People v. ZimmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- State v. PrayNevada Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Addington v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.