Legal Opinion

State v. Rider

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Grant District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Green, C.:

The information in this case charged the defendant with feloniously buying and receiving one mare, of the value of $100, the property of Carl Gall, jr., “then lately before feloniously stolen, taken and carried away,” knowing the same to have been so stolen. The part of § 92 of the crimes act which is applicable to this case is as follows:

“Every person who shall buy or in any way receive any goods, money, i ights in action, personal property, or any valuable security or effects whatsoever, . . . that shall have been stolen from another, knowing the same to have been so…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ZimmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. State v. PrayNevada Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Addington v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API