Legal Opinion

State v. Rachman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 2, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On application to open a .judgment entered in this court affirming a conviction of the defendants in the Essex Quarter Sessions on an indictment for receiving stolen goods.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

This is an application to vacate a judgment of this court entered in this case under a stipulation of counsel that judgment of affirmance should be entered therein.

*121A writ of error was taken to the Court of Errors and Appeals from the judgment entered in this court on said stipulation. That court dismissed the writ upon the record returned, for the reasons given in that court in Parker v. Wallace, 24 Vroom 243. Upon the record being remitted here, the pending motion is made.

While the judgment entered here was voluntary upon the part of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moschell v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  2. Parker v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. State v. BottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  3. State v. MacQueenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  4. State v. VanderhaveNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. State v. DancygerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API