Legal Opinion · Dissent

Walker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1995Published

1DissentFriedman, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Because I believe that Nationwide Insurance Company (Nationwide) was the insurance carrier for Sher-bren Manufacturing, Inc. (Employer) when Judy Walker, Rita McNaughton DeSanto, Charlotte Haas, and Rebecca Kunselman (collectively, Claimants) sustained work-related injuries on January 7 and January 9, 1987, I would reverse the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) and hold Nationwide liable for the payment of compensation benefits to Claimants. In addition, because I believe that the Board lacks authority to grant a supersedeas with respect to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consumers Education & Protective Ass'n v. NolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Jaffray v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. ADIA Personnel Agency v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Travelers Insurance v. GunsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Cumberland Publishers, Inc. v. Carlisle Area Board of School DirectorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API