Legal Opinion
Greater Hartford Bridge Authority v. Russo
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 13, 1963No. File 130110PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The complaint alleges the plaintiff’s authority, ownership in the defendants’ land, public need, convenience, and requirement of the property for a public purpose, a grant of right of entry upon the defendants’ land, notice, and inability to agree, after a right of entry, upon a purchase price. The motion alleges that the plaintiff is not the proper party to bring suit and that it is acting in violation of due process.
Section 13-221 of the General Statutes authorizes the Greater Hartford Bridge Authority to make application to the Superior Court for the county in which the real estate or…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- People v. . Adirondack Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- League v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Glenport Main Corporation v. Covelluzzi, No. 23 03 62 (Jan. 31, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991