Wolf v. O'Conner
Michigan Supreme Court
Behearing, upon application of complainants, of case reported in 83 Mich, 301. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
We granted a rehearing in this case *125upon the application of the complainants, and the case has again been submitted -to us for our consideration. The opinion handed down by us is reported in 83 Mich. 301.
One of the points made upon the original hearing was that the instrument was void upon its face. In the opinion handed down we said that the complainants had failed to point out the reason of their assertion that the deed of assignment was void upon its face; but in their motion for a rehearing they have stated the grounds upon which this claim is made, and to which our attention is now…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson ex dem. Van Buren v. MyersNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- Averill v. LoucksNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Trask v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Barnum v. HempsteadNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Jackson, ex rel. Bigelow v. TimmermanNew York Supreme Court · 1831
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Daniel v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Flynn v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Seely v. O'ConnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891