Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealthv. Pulleyn

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1990Published

1DissentBarbieri, Senior Judge

I cannot agree with the conclusion reached by the majority and, therefore, most respectfully dissent.

In my view, the case relied upon by the majority, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Bailey, 116 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 312, 541 A.2d 1167 (1988), does not sufficiently support the majority’s position. I note first that the decision in Bailey preceded the filing of the opinion in FMC Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Wadatz), 116 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 527, 542 A.2d 616 (1988), wherein this Court reaffirmed its holding in Murhon v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farber v. ENGLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Murhon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. FMC Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Dover v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API