Legal Opinion

Shimer v. Foley, Hoag & Eliot LLP

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 16, 2003No. 00-P-1088PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRapoza, J.

This is a legal malpractice case brought by a client, Stephen Shimer, who claims that, but for the negligent advice of his attorneys at Foley, Hoag & Eliot LLP (FHE), he would have settled his underlying dispute with Synthes Ltd. (U.S.A.) (Synthes) and avoided costly litigation. With a jury waiting in the wings, a Superior Court judge granted FHE’s written motion in limine to preclude certain evidence of damages. As a consequence of that ruling, Shimer was unable to prove the essential element of damages as to the two pending counts in his legal malpractice complaint, and the judge dismissed…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Williams v. ElyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Watros v. Greater Lynn Mental Health & Retardation Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Sereni v. Star Sportswear Manufacturing Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Poly v. MoylanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PurdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Nortek, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  3. Glover v. GloverAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Coastal Orthopaedic Institute, P.C. v. BongiornoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Lennon v. Durcan-Cuddy Insurance AgencyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API