Legal Opinion

In re Trust of Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1938No. 2928Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

The above entitled cause is now being determined on three motions as follows:(1) Motion of five religious and welfare corporations, all claiming to be residuary beneficiaries of the trust in question, which motion is set out in five separate and distinct demands.(2) A supplemental motion filed by these same residuary beneficiaries; and(3) Motibn of Sarah E. Smith, appellant, to strike from the files all motions of the - residuary beneficiaries.

Oral argument has been presented at, great length. ,

In-the interest of brevity and an early decision we are refraining from making…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Linton v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API