Legal Opinion

United States v. Curley King

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1968No. 21553-APublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:

Curley King was convicted and sentenced, after a non-jury trial, for knowingly and wilfully concealing information concerning the robbery of a national bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4 (1964). He appeals, arguing that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction and that 18 U.S.C. § 4 is unconstitutional as applied in this case.1

Insofar as relevant for the purposes of this appeal, the indictment charges, in effect, that on April 29, 1966, in Los Angeles County, California, defendant, having knowledge of the commission of a robbery of the Vermont and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Neal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. David Edward Lancey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Thomas TrigilioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. United States v. William DaddanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  3. Morrell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. United States v. Caraballo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. James Leroy Iverson v. State of North DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API