Legal Opinion

Yearwood, Johnson, Stanton & Crabtree, Inc. v. Foxland Development Venture

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 6, 1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

This is an appeal of the chancellor’s refusal to set aside a default judgment he granted when the defendants failed to obey the court’s order to get new counsel and comply with discovery. We affirm the judgment of the court below.

Yearwood, Johnson, Stanton & Crabtree, Inc. filed an action to collect the fees due for architectural services on a development project. In the defendants’ answer, filed on January 20, 1988, the thrust of the defense was that the fees were not yet due because the project had not been suspended or abandoned nor had the developer made the first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Rockwell InternationalTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Moore v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shahrdar v. Global Housing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Lori D. Atchley D/B/A Rcw Realty Company v. Rk Company, Robert R. Krilich, and Donna J. KrilichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. H. G. Hill Realty Company, L.L.C. v. Re/Max Carriage House, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  4. Murray v. Christian Methodist Episcopal ChurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. Billy Walls dba B.S. Walls Construction v. Jeffrey S. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API