United States v. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Defendantr-Appellant Alex Thomas appeals the decision of the district court, assigning error to the district court’s assessment of his sentence for violating his supervised release. In particular, Thomas alleges that the district court failed to apply the factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 in determining his sentence. For the following reasons, we DISMISS Thomas’s appeal on the grounds that it is moot.
Background
On December 14, 1995, a jury convicted Thomas of twenty-one counts for making false claims in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287, a Class D felony. Thomas was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Rudolph A. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Kevin WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- In Re WingerterBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- In Re WingerterBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- In re: Gerald A. Wingerter v.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007