Legal Opinion

Hurwitz v. Hurwitz

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 22, 1943No. 8156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order granting a motion for the appointment of a receiver pendente lite. The nature of the main controversy is set forth in App.D.C., 136 F.2d 796, decided this day, in which we affirm the final judgment of the trial court. Plaintiff's prima facie case disclosed that the defendant was fraudently withholding assets of the estate. In addition there was evidence that the defendant had agreed to set aside the property and money during the pendency of the suit, but that he had been using the money in his business. On this record we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurwitz v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Provident Relief Ass'n v. VernonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
  3. Wood v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. United States v. PendergrastCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  3. United States v. Estelle Pendergrast, United States of America v. James Burton, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Burton, United States of America v. Willie Gibbs, as Administrator of the Estate of Elex Gibbs, Deceased, United States of America v. Willie Gibbs, as Administrator of the Estate of Inez Gibbs, Deceased, United States of America v. Isiah Thompson, United States of America v. Azailie ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API