Legal Opinion

Newby v. Rosees

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

This is the case of Newby v. Bogers, 40 Ind. 9, wherein the law governing it was essentially settled. Upon its remandment by that decision, the appellee withdrew all the paragraphs of his complaint except the eighth and ninth, upon which the case now stands. To these paragraphs the appellant filed separate demurrers, alleging as ground the insufficiency of the facts stated. The demurrers were overruled and exceptions taken; whereupon the appellant answered,—

1. General denial, and filed his counter-claim in paragraphs second, third and fourth.

To these paragraphs of counter-claim, demurrers,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aurora Fire Insurance v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Newby v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. McKinney v. Shaw & Lippencott Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Barlow v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Helton v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ralston v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Isgrig v. Franklin National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. MillikanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API