Ramos v. Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RAMON RAMOS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 22-CV-0061-CVE-JFJ ) SCHLUMBERGER GROUP WELFARE ) BENEFITS PLAN, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Now before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Case and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 37). Plaintiff filed this case asserting a claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
29 U.S.C. § 1101
et seq. (ERISA). Plaintiff argues that the Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan (the Plan) unreasonably delayed in complying with the Court’s remand order. He asks the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- LaAsmar v. Phelps Dodge Corp. Life, Accidental Death & Dismemberment & Dependent Life Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Gilbertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Solnin v. Sun Life and Health Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Robertson v. Standard Insurance Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016