Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 29, 2024No. 4:22-cv-00061Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RAMON RAMOS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 22-CV-0061-CVE-JFJ ) SCHLUMBERGER GROUP WELFARE ) BENEFITS PLAN, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Now before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Case and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 37). Plaintiff filed this case asserting a claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,

29 U.S.C. § 1101

et seq. (ERISA). Plaintiff argues that the Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan (the Plan) unreasonably delayed in complying with the Court’s remand order. He asks the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. LaAsmar v. Phelps Dodge Corp. Life, Accidental Death & Dismemberment & Dependent Life Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Gilbertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. Solnin v. Sun Life and Health Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  4. Robertson v. Standard Insurance Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API