Legal Opinion
Drath v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 21, 1932No. 1 Div. 666PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suits were to declare resulting trusts in lands and for general relief. The two cases were consolidated, by agreement, for convenience. One is, styled the “Boutell Case” and the other the “Allen Case.”
The appellant filed the two bills of complaint, and as consolidated by agreement, they were so considered by the court. One bill was against Phillip G. Armstrong individually, and the other against Josephine Johnson, Elvera G. Armstrong, and Agnes E. Utter, who were the heirs of Oscar Johnson, deceased, and against Phillip G. Armstrong, as the executor of his estate. In each case the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Lucas v. Bank of DarienSupreme Court of Alabama · 1830
- Whitehead v. BoutwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Alabama City, G. & A. Ry. Co. v. KyleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amann v. BurkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Jacksonville Public Service Corp. v. Profile Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Thornton v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Council v. Estate of Skelton (Ex Parte Skelton)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.