Legal Opinion
Homemakers Home & Health Care Services, Inc. v. Carden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1976No. 74-1680PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILES, District Judge.
This appeal raises novel issues of first impression under the so-called “retail exemption” to the minimum wage requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Appellant Homemakers Home and Health Care Services, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Homemakers International Co., operates a series of local offices which engage in the business of providing domestic and health care services on a temporary basis. They appeal a judgment by the District Court, Middle District, Tennessee that this enterprise is not a “retail or service establishment” exempt under Section 13(a)(2)…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Larry Worthington, Roger Cameron, David Davey and Gerald Kent, Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc., a Washington Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Usery v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Larry Worthington, Roger Cameron, David Davey and Gerald Kent, Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc., a Washington Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Homemakers Home And Health Care Services, Inc. v. CardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Usery v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977