Legal Opinion
People v. Fanning
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 1949PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant’s petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.
Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed. [See 300 N. Y. 677.]
2Cited by26 opinions
- People v. RobertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- People v. YaminNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. FeinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- People v. LesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.