Legal Opinion

People v. Fanning

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1949PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant’s petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed. [See 300 N. Y. 677.]

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. People v. YaminNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. FeinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. People v. LesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API