Legal Opinion

Jose Balcacer v. Matthew Divris

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 16, 2025No. 4:23-cv-11843Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) JOSE BALCACER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 4:23-CV-11843-MRG ) MATTHEW DIVRIS, ) ) Respondent. ) ) ORDER ON RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED PETITION (ECF No. 30) GUZMAN, J. Before the Court is Respondent Matthew Divris’s (“Divris”) Motion to Dismiss Petitioner Jose Balcacer’s (“Balcacer”) Amended Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF Nos. 30; 27]. Divris argues that the Court should dismiss the petition because Balcacer has failed to exhaust his state court remedies for certain claims. Balcacer is currently…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API