Legal Opinion

Verment v. Nordstrom-Best

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 1975No. 400-670PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

Claimant was employed as a shoe salesman for Nordstrom-Best, Inc., and suffered an on-the-job injury to his right arm and shoulder on May 6, 1971. His claim was accepted and he received treatment for this injury, including surgical excision of the long head of the right biceps tendon. About December 1972, approximately 19 months after the arm-shoulder injury, claimant first notified employer’s insurance carrier that he was suffering from back pain which he associated with his injury of May 6, 1971. The carrier denied liability for the back injury. The hearing officer affirmed the denial as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neathamer v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. von Kohlbeck v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API