Legal Opinion
People v. Ferro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStein, J.
*1244Initially, defendant’s challenge to the voluntariness and facial sufficiency of his plea is not preserved for our review, as the record before us fails to indicate that he moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]; People v Teele, 92 AD3d 972, 972 [2012]). The narrow exception to the preservation requirement does not apply here, as County Court did not “acceptf ] a plea without further inquiry after the allocution clearly cast[ ] significant doubt upon the defendant’s guilt or otherwise callfed] into question the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. TeeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. PassinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. GoodellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. GoodellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. PassinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013