Sanchez v. Keisler
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
In 2005, Congress amended the Violence Against Women Act (“VAWA”) to make it easier for victims of domestic abuse who face removal from the United States to file motions to reopen their immigration proceedings. See Pub.L. No. 109-162, 119 Stat. 2960 (2005). Ordinarily, strict time limitations apply to these motions. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). For persons qualifying under VAWA, however, Congress has lengthened the period within which a motion to reopen may be filed, has altered the numerical limit that applies to ordinary motions, and has provided for a stay of removal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Azmond Ali v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Adrian Kerciku and Najada Kerciku v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, and John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Stanislaw Pilch and Zofia Pilch v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Sunita Patel, Kamarkant Patel, Pallavi Patel, and Kalpana Patel v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Roberto Flores, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Li Fang Huang v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Jezierski v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Soumare v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Jose Zambrano v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.