Legal Opinion
Pep Boys v. Aranosian
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided November 30, 1995No. CV-94-354-MPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Pep Boys v. Aranosian CV-94-354-M 11/30/95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE The Pep Bovs, Manny, Moe & Jack, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 94-354-M Robert Aranosian, Lynda Aranosian, and Capital City Motors, Inc., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, The Pep Boys, Manny, Moe and Jack ("Pep Boys"), a Pennsylvania Corporation, brought this suit asserting various claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1) and 1125(a), as well as under New Hampshire's statutory and common law. Essentially, Pep Boys seeks permanent injunctive relief, monetary damages, and its…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pignons S. A. De Mecanique De Precision v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. v. Beckman Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Quabaug Rubber Company v. Fabiano Shoe Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Kenneth G. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.