Legal Opinion

Hagler v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1978No. Civ. 1426PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff sued the defendant in detinue. The defendant counterclaimed on the basis that plaintiff had committed certain violations of the Federal Truth in Lending Act.

The learned trial judge found the defendant's counterclaim to be barred by the statute of limitations. 15 U.S.C. § 1640 (e). The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether the trial judge was correct in the above determination. We find that he was not and reverse and remand.

The facts are virtually without dispute and pertinently are as follows:

On January 19, 1976, the defendant purchased an automobile from a dealership. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hewlett v. John Blue Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  2. Burch v. Southeastern Sand Gravel CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Braggs v. Jim Skinner Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Darrow v. Beneficial Fin. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Snow v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Adams v. Coblentz G.M.C. Truck SalesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Ex Parte FletcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API