Legal Opinion
Paschall v. Southern Ry. Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1948Published
1Opinion
Oh Petitioh to Rehear.
It is suggested in the Railway Company’s petition to rehear that we were mistaken when in our opinion heretofore rendered we stated that “these agents had actually been informed before they put the train in motion again that this child had not alighted from that train.” That allegation of the declaration upon which we based our above quoted statement is as follows:
“That upon arrival of the defendant’s said train in its terminal at Chattanooga, Tenn., a representative of the Travelers’ Aid Society in Chattanooga, Tenn., was pre*110sent to meet plaintiff and when plaintiff did…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
- Byrd v. Pioneer-Jellico Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1943
- Tennessee R.R. Co. v. KingsleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929