Legal Opinion

Joyce v. Cockrill

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1899No. 613PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

LURTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an action upon a promissory note, made by James E. Joyce & Co., with the plaintiff in error, John Joyce, as surety. The note is one of several made for the purchase price of the assets of an insolvent trading corporation, sold under order and directions of a chancery court at Little Rock, Ark. All the notes were payable to a receiver appointed by said court, and the note in suit was assigned to the First National Bank of Little Rock, which sues through the defendant in error, its duly-appointed receiver. The suit was by petition according to the Ohio code…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Board of Supervisors v. . OtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. McCormick v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Schroeppell v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. State ex rel. Bothrick v. PotterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Evans v. KisterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  2. Hess v. SchaffnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. National Surety Co. v. George E. Breece Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Waggoner v. DorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  5. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API