Dryfus v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Custer county. Tried below before Hamer, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.
This suit was instituted before a justice of the peace on the 29th day of October, 1890, by the Moline, Milburn & *234Stod'dard Company against W. N. Dryfus, a summons being issued returnable on November 3, which was returned duly served upon the defendant. On the return day both parties appeared, each filing a bill of particulars, and on application of the defendant a continuance was had until December 2, when there was a trial to a jury, who, being unable to agree were discharged and the case was adjourned by the justice to December 9, when the defendant having failed to appear at the hour…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crowell v. GallowayNebraska Supreme Court · 1874
- Walker v. LutzNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- Haggerty v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
- Newlove v. WoodwardNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Leach v. SutphenNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morgan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Norwegian Plow Co. v. BollmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Farris v. State ex rel. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Linton v. HeyeNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.