Legal Opinion

Dryfus v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1895No. 5326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Custer county. Tried below before Hamer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

This suit was instituted before a justice of the peace on the 29th day of October, 1890, by the Moline, Milburn & *234Stod'dard Company against W. N. Dryfus, a summons being issued returnable on November 3, which was returned duly served upon the defendant. On the return day both parties appeared, each filing a bill of particulars, and on application of the defendant a continuance was had until December 2, when there was a trial to a jury, who, being unable to agree were discharged and the case was adjourned by the justice to December 9, when the defendant having failed to appear at the hour…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crowell v. GallowayNebraska Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Walker v. LutzNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Haggerty v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Newlove v. WoodwardNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Leach v. SutphenNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Norwegian Plow Co. v. BollmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Farris v. State ex rel. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Linton v. HeyeNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API