Ketline v. State
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error.
1Opinion of the Court
*469The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
The only question presented on this record is whether the indictment, which omits to state the time when the alleged offence was committed, can be sustained upon our statute (Gera. Stat, p. 1128, § 42), which enacts that no indictment- shall be held insufficient for such an omission in any case where time is not of the essence of the offence, as it is not in this case.
The first point for consideration touches the power of the legislature, in view of those clauses of the constitution which declare that “in all criminal- prosecutions the accused…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Noles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. EnglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- State v. WitterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- State v. MinfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.