City of Gainesville, Georgia v. Southern Railway Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:
This case involves basically a determination whether an ordinance of the City of Gainesville, Georgia, requiring Southern Railway Company to install and maintain entirely at its own expense automatic signalling devices where Southern’s main line tracks intersect with Bradford Street, is so arbitrary and unreasonable as to be in violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
The City of Gainesville originally brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to compel Southern…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Turner v. FoucheSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ex Parte CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Zarate v. State Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services'District Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
- Southern Railway Company v. City of MorristownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Zarate v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHABILITATIVE SERV.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
- City of Gainesville, Georgia, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Southern Railway Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. City of LaurelDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.