Fowler v. McPhee
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from, the District Court of Arapahoe County. ■
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.
The brevity of the testimony occasions ns some difficulty in stating the controversy. We can find enough to state the *186issue which ought to have been tried and point out the course which must be pursued on the subsequent trial.
MePhee & McGinnity were lumber dealers in Denver. McAlpine had a contract with the Maxwell Land Grant Company to cut annually a certain number of trees on the grant, paying that corporation for the timber according to the stumpage. There was no specified time within which any part of the amount other than the annual limit should be cut. McAlpine had some arrangement with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bank of Michigan v. ElyNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Nelson v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Hughes v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Proctor v. HartiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Ketchum v. StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.