Legal Opinion
State v. Mathiason
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1976PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*3DENECKE, J.
The issue is whether defendant’s confession was admissible. He initially confessed before he was given his Miranda rights. The state contends the confession was not obtained by "custodial interrogation.” The trial court admitted evidence of the confession. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 22 Or App 494, 539 P2d 1122 (1975). We granted defendant’s petition for review.
An officer of the State Police investigated a theft at a residence near Pendleton. He asked the lady of the house which had been burglarized if she suspected anyone. She replied that the defendant was the only one she…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. TravisOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. MathiasonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
3Cited by23 opinions
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. WipflerIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Hunter v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. PazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.