Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 8, 1911No. 1014PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was indicted for assault with intent to murder. Upon a trial he was convicted of aggravated assault.

The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, because of the insufficiency of the recognizance in that it fails to show the punishment assessed, and fails to show the court in which the defendant was tried and before which he obligates himself to appear.

In the case of Thompson v. State, 35 Tex.Crim. Rep., Judge Henderson, rendering the opinion, says: "The appellant's recognizance, omitting the prior portions, recites, `and who has been convicted of said…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bernard and Odette Port v. Jack Heard, Sheriff of Harris County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Ex Parte MuncyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Ex Parte JosephCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API