Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 13, 1981No. 80-782-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

Does a trial judge abuse his sentencing discretion when he uniformly refuses to consider a grant of probation for an offense even though probation is an available sentencing alternative? We hold, and the state concedes, that this mechanistic approach to sentencing is not the exercise of sentencing discretion. The sentence must therefore be vacated, and this case must be remanded for the resentencing of Dale Martin.

Martin was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of sec. 161.41(1) (b), Stats. Probation is available as a sentencing alternative for this offense. Section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. United States v. Stewart FossCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  5. Hanneman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GuzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. State v. HalbertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  4. State v. OgdenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State of Maine v. Tara L. WatsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API