Legal Opinion

Epifano v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 16, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant appeals, as *502limited by her brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), dated September 2, 1999, as, in effect, conditionally granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, and (2) an order of the same court, dated October 28, 1999, as denied that branch of her cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 2, 1999, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by so much of the order dated October 28,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lauer v. RappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Ashton v. ScotmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Dirito v. StanleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Risman v. LeaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. SaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Kaiser v. Van HoutenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Pere v. St. OngeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API