Legal Opinion

State v. Lamoreaux

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 8, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In Yiew of the admission by the prosecutor in his brief and at the oral argument as to the insufficiency of the proofs to support the indictment, the judgment below, 29 N. J. Super. 204, is affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.

For reversal — None.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. LamoreauxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LambNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  2. State v. BorattoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. State v. BorattoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. State v. McDougaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. State v. McDougaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990