Legal Opinion
State v. Lamoreaux
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 8, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
In Yiew of the admission by the prosecutor in his brief and at the oral argument as to the insufficiency of the proofs to support the indictment, the judgment below, 29 N. J. Super. 204, is affirmed.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.
For reversal — None.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. LamoreauxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LambNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- State v. BorattoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- State v. BorattoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- State v. McDougaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. McDougaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990