Legal Opinion
Bauman Chevrolet Inc. v. Faust
Erie County Court of Common Pleas
Decided June 17, 1953No. 28805PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By McCRYSTAL, J.
This matter arises by virtue of a demurrer filed by the defendant to the plaintiff’s petition on the grounds, that
*1461. The petition does not state a cause of action, and
2. That the action is barred by the Statute of limitations.
Following the introductory paragraph, the plaintiff’s petition reads as follows:—
“The plaintiff says that on or about the 14th day of February, 1951, it was the owner of a certain 1947 Chevrolet Aero Sedan; that on or about the 14th day of February, 1951, plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral agreement whereby plaintiff delivered its…
2Cited by8 opinions
- New Riegel Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Buehrer Group Architecture & Eng., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Underwriters at Lloyd's Under Policy No. Lho 10497 v. Peerless Storage Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
- National Car Rentals v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
- Schiffman v. IttsOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
- Mills v. Liberty Moving & Storage, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.