Legal Opinion

Bauman Chevrolet Inc. v. Faust

Erie County Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 17, 1953No. 28805PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By McCRYSTAL, J.

This matter arises by virtue of a demurrer filed by the defendant to the plaintiff’s petition on the grounds, that

*1461. The petition does not state a cause of action, and

2. That the action is barred by the Statute of limitations.

Following the introductory paragraph, the plaintiff’s petition reads as follows:—

“The plaintiff says that on or about the 14th day of February, 1951, it was the owner of a certain 1947 Chevrolet Aero Sedan; that on or about the 14th day of February, 1951, plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral agreement whereby plaintiff delivered its…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. New Riegel Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Buehrer Group Architecture & Eng., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Underwriters at Lloyd's Under Policy No. Lho 10497 v. Peerless Storage Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
  3. National Car Rentals v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Schiffman v. IttsOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Mills v. Liberty Moving & Storage, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API