Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Prestwood

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1924No. 4 Div. 137PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, O. J.

The original bill was by the mortgagor to enjoin a sale of the property under the mortgage, sought an accounting and the payment of the mortgage debt. Respondent answered and sought by cross-bill affirmative relief; that is, the foreclosure of the mortgage. A cross-bill, or answer in the nature of a cross-bill, was essential to a foreclosure and which could not he decreed without same. Bedell v. New Eng. Mtg. Secty. Co., 91 Ala. 325, 8 South. 494; Ketchum v. Creagh, 53 Ala. 224; Davis v. Cook, 65 Ala. 617.

The fact that a mortgage contains a power of sale does not deprive an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Vaughan v. MarableSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Bedell v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Ketchum v. CreaghSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Hylton v. CatheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Hawkins v. SnellingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Capitol Theater Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Harvey v. KirbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API