Jackson v. Prestwood
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, O. J.
The original bill was by the mortgagor to enjoin a sale of the property under the mortgage, sought an accounting and the payment of the mortgage debt. Respondent answered and sought by cross-bill affirmative relief; that is, the foreclosure of the mortgage. A cross-bill, or answer in the nature of a cross-bill, was essential to a foreclosure and which could not he decreed without same. Bedell v. New Eng. Mtg. Secty. Co., 91 Ala. 325, 8 South. 494; Ketchum v. Creagh, 53 Ala. 224; Davis v. Cook, 65 Ala. 617.
The fact that a mortgage contains a power of sale does not deprive an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Vaughan v. MarableSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Bedell v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Ketchum v. CreaghSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Hylton v. CatheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Hawkins v. SnellingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. Capitol Theater Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
- Harvey v. KirbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.