Legal Opinion

Marabella v. Lundy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with cost.

We need not consider the recent amendments to the CPLR allowing the lower courts to exercise discretion “to excuse delay or default resulting from law office failure” (CPLR 2005, 3012, subd [d]), for we agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff’s papers failed to establish the merit of the cause of action as required by 22 NYCRR 675.5 (b).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Basetti v. NourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Balducci v. JasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Brann v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Guzman v. Members America Credit UnionCivil Court of the City of New York · 1997
  5. Mancheno v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API