Eyman v. Wyman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCLOUD, J.
¶ 1 The people of the state of Washington exercised their constitutionally guaranteed initiative power by referring Initiative 940 (I-940), an initiative concerning police reform, to the legislature. The legislature voted to enact it. The enrolled bill doctrine-a doctrine that ensures judicial respect for the legislative branch-bars this court from second-guessing the legislature's own declaration that it validly enacted that bill into law. Specifically, the enrolled bill doctrine bars this court from invalidating the enrolled I-940 based on pure speculation about whether the legislature…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Carrick v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- All Seasons Living Centers, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Sehome Park Care Center, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Freedom Found. v. Teamsters Local 117 Segregated FundWashington Supreme Court · 2021
- Defend Wash. v. HobbsWashington Supreme Court · 2024
- Mothering Justice v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 2024
- State Construction Inc v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Washington State Legislature v. InsleeWashington Supreme Court · 2021