Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 15, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

• Appeal in Chancery. Bill to cancel a deed on the ground of fraud. Heard on the pleadings and special master’s report after the June Term, 1918, Caledonia County, Slack, Chancellor. Decree dismissing the bill with costs. The plaintiffs appealed. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtMiles, J.

The bill in this case was originally brought by the plaintiff Ada M. against the defendants George K. and. Annie M. Bennett, and after the same was entered in court the other plaintiffs and defendants were made parties. The parties who have taken an active part in the trial are Ada M. and the defendants George K. and Annie M. Bennett. The additional parties were made such because of a question having been raised concerning the title to the premises in question, and we think it is as well to treat that subject here as in any part of our opinion.

William H. Bennett, husband of Ada M., on August…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bruer v. BruerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Mills v. CatlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  3. Flagg v. EamesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867
  4. Johnson v. ChambleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. DeGoosh v. Baldwin & RussSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kipp v. Chips EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Kennedy, Admr. v. Rutter, Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. Blair v. Blair and BlairSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  4. University of Vermont & State Agricultural College v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API