Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 6, 1943Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

There was sufficient evidence to raise a question of fact, and although the court would be warranted in setting aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence, there being a jury there must be a new trial. (Starr v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 257 App. Div. 261.)

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Starr v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939