Legal Opinion

Arrington v. Hou

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided September 23, 2021No. 4:21-cv-04079Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS OTIS ARRINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) No.: 21-cv-4079-JBM ) GRACE B. HOU, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MERIT REVIEW ORDER Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, and detained at the Rushville Treatment and Detention Center, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court must dismiss a complaint "at any time" if a plaintiff attempts to proceed in forma pauperis in an action which is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim, even if part of the filing fee has been paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)(2). In reviewing the complaint, the Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Gregory Turley v. Dave RednourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Michael Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API