Arrington v. Hou
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS OTIS ARRINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) No.: 21-cv-4079-JBM ) GRACE B. HOU, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MERIT REVIEW ORDER Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, and detained at the Rushville Treatment and Detention Center, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court must dismiss a complaint "at any time" if a plaintiff attempts to proceed in forma pauperis in an action which is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim, even if part of the filing fee has been paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)(2). In reviewing the complaint, the Court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Gregory Turley v. Dave RednourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Michael Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.