Legal Opinion

De Santo v. Barnsley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1984No. 837PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, President Judge:

This case presents the novel issue of whether two persons of the same sex can contract a common law marriage. We hold that they cannot, as a matter of law. The order of the trial court dismissing appellant’s complaint for divorce is therefore affirmed.

On February 16, 1981, appellant, John DeSanto, filed a complaint for divorce against appellee, William Barnsley. In his complaint appellant alleged that on June 14, 1970, in a ceremony before friends, he and appellee entered into a common law marriage, and that then they lived together until November 15, 1980. Appellant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baker v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Manfredi EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Singer v. HaraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Baker v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Buradus v. General Cement Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Constant A. v. Paul C.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Rutgers Council of AAUP Chapters v. RutgersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Shahar v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API